Scenes From An Italian Restaurant

Night-time pleasure on BW--and a visit to the good ol' days of Billy Joel.

Friday Blog Spotlight: Chancelucky

BW Readers,

I have decided to share some news with you. On Monday I was diagnosed with cubital tunnel syndrome, which means my pinky and ringer finger tingle a lot on my left hand and arm, and they are losing sensation. I've kind of known what my problem was for 2 months, but unfortunately, there aren't many specialists in this area within my HMO, so the appointment queue was long. Next week I start the process getting OT to determine what kind of splint to get, then PT for my shoulder since this form of CTS has crawled into my shoulder. I welcome it as I was hit from behind on Tuesday, and my old whiplash (another story) resurfaced, and my left clavicle is also sore. Thus typing is becoming uncomfortable for me.

Enough about my typing woes and the causes of them. In the spirit of the Edwards family, which tries to make lemonade when given lemons (and believe me, the M$M gives plenty of them), I have been getting permissions to redistribute excellent blog posts, as you saw earlier this week with TomP. However, I am going to try something new: spotlighting blogs on my blogroll. I won't be doing this each week, but I will try my best to get the spotlight up at least twice a month.

Friday's spotlight: Chancelucky

Chancelucky and I have been been linking to one another's blogs for quite some time. He gets the Edwards news over here and occasionally I reveal something about myself, which I think bloggers tend to like when the blogs are solo and nongroup blogs. At CL's (as I refer to him at his site) blog, I get to read some of the best reviews on popular culture topics, as well as some good political/social commentaries.

Last night, CL put up a classic about the fuss-budgets making much ado about nothing related to one of the characters in the Harry Potter series and ties it to the inane things by Re-pugs in the Congress try to get away with. Mind you, I am not into the fantasy genre, and haven't been since Bewitched, which was a humorous show, and I tend to like animals who do great things more than wizards and dark shows such as Charmed. Barnaby Collins in Dark Shadows scared the bejeezus out of me when I watched it in the afternoons during my grade school years.

I encourage you to visit CL's blog post here. It is exquisite satire, just as good as anyone would write in the New Yorker. To whet your appetite, the title of the post is: Albus Dumbledore Tells All (a really odd Karl Rove Adventure).

You don't even have to know much about the characters in the Harry Potter series, and you will smile immediately. I was almost laughing out loud when I finished reading this succinct, delightful post. Why didn't I laugh? Well, I did a little. The smile was bigger though.

Enjoy!

Is It Really Arson? California Burns Because of Jerks

I just read this on CNN:

ORANGE COUNTY, California (CNN) -- One of the larger fires in Southern California is a suspected arson, a fire official confirmed Thursday.

The FBI, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and the Orange County Fire Authority are investigating the Santiago Fire, which has burned more than 22,000 acres, Orange County Fire Battalion Chief Kris Concepcion told CNN.

"The reason we think it is [arson] is because we found multiple points of origin," Concepcion said. "... Our investigators have confirmed that this is, in fact, arson."

Concepcion would not say how the fire was started, but said evidence indicated the arsonist wanted the fire to grow rapidly.

Read the rest of the story here. Disgusting that someone would want to put that many people and animals in harm's way. I have friends and relatives in Southern California, and I pray for their continued safety.

John Edwards will be our First Green President

Note BW readers: this is Part 2 of TomP's interview of Brent Blackwelder, again redistributed by the blogger's permission. Crossposted at Blue New Hampshire

President Bush plans to play the part of the hero by visiting California, now ravaged by fire. But on this issue he's the villain -- it's two years after Hurricane Katrina and the only progress he's made is actually acknowledging that global warming exists. If we're going to avoid tragedies like this in the future, we must take the long-term view. On this point, the science is clear: global warming has already led to increased wildfire activity in the U.S., and if we don't dramatically reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the near future, the problem is going to get much worse.

Friends of the Earth

More than ever, we need a president committed to making real and deep change in how we treat the planet.

"After 7 years of George Bush – the worst, most destructive environmental president in modern history – it is definitely time for change, and that change starts by electing John Edwards as President."

This week, I interviewed Brent Blackwelder, President of Friends of the Earth and FOE Action, via email about the FoE Action endorsement of John Edwards.

FoE Action provides political muscle on legislative battles in the U.S. for its sister organization, Friends of the Earth, which is part of a network of affiliates in over 70 nations around the world. On October 14, FOE Action became the first major environmental organization to endorse a candidate for president, and they endorsed John Edwards:

"Friends of the Earth Action enthusiastically endorses John Edwards for President," said Brent Blackwelder, president of FOE Action.

Friends of the Earth Action Endorses John Edwards

FoE Action well understands that you cannot sit down at the table with the corporate polluters and their lobbyists, and then expect them to treat the planet right. As John Edwards has said, if you sit down at the table with them, they'll eat your lunch. You've got to beat them:

Q: You have been President of Friends of the Earth and Friends of the Earth Action since 1994. In that time, you have witnessed the buying of the American government by corporate power and their lobbyists. How important is John Edwards' willingness to take on these entrenched interests to you in making your endorsement?

A: This played a big part in our decision. John Edwards has taken a stand against the lobbyists and special interests that have so driven environmental policies in the Bush Administration. Only when candidates refuse to take money from the lobbyists for big oil and big coal can they pursue the kind of environmental polices that protect health and safety of our families. Of all the leading candidates running, we believe John Edwards has the greatest potential to stand up to corporate special interests in the White House.

We also talked about John Edwards' plan to address global warming:

Q: At present, part of the costs of global warming are externalized on all of us. Does Edwards favor measures to auction polluter permits to, at least in part, ensure that part of the cost of global warming goes back to where it belongs – on the actual product?

A: Yes, polluter permits are an important component of Edwards' plan. He would require polluters to pay for their global warming pollution, a portion of which will raise $10 billion a year for a New Energy Economy Fund to jumpstart clean, renewable, and efficient energy technologies and create 1 million jobs.

Q: What is Edwards' position on the annual taxpayer funded subsidies that currently exist for oil companies?

A: Edwards calls for eliminating $3 billion in annual government subsidies to oil companies. He even says he is "very open to the possibility of an excess profits tax" on oil companies. We feel this is a crucial first step in getting our country back on the right track with its energy policy.

I don't know about you, but I agree with Brent Blackwelder and John Edwards about building new nuclear power plants: don't do it! This is a clear distinction between John Edwards and the other two major candidates: Clinton and Obama:

Q. Senators Clinton and Obama have joined one of the top Republicans in the race, Senator McCain of Arizona, to sponsor the Climate Stewardship and Innovation Act of 2007. The measure includes more than $3.6 billion in funding and loan guarantees for the planning and construction of nuclear plants using new reactor designs. Does FOE Action oppose the use of taxpayer money to subsidize the nuclear power industry? What is your position on this bill?

A. Friends of the Earth wholeheartedly opposes the construction and development of nuclear power in the United States. Edwards is on the same page, here. He believes nuclear power is too costly, too dangerous, and too vulnerable to attack by our nation's enemies. New Hampshire, where FOE Action announced its endorsement of Edwards, has the unfortunate distinction of being home to the last-constructed nuclear power plant in the country, Seabrook Station nuclear power plant. The plant places great environmental and health risks on the areas around it, and if constructing a nuclear power was a bad idea 30 years ago, it's an even worse idea now, particularly given the new realities we face in terms of national security. Nuclear power simply isn't worth it's risks, when accidents can have environmental implications that last for generations. And John Edwards is the only candidate to unambiguously say no to nuclear power.

And what about Coal to Liquid? I'm with Edwards and FoE Action on this.

Q: What is your position on Coal to Liquid technology? One Democratic presidential candidate cosponsored a bill to provide taxpayer subsidies for this technology. Edwards opposes CtL. What does using, let alone subsidizing, CtL really mean for our environment?

A: Liquid coal is a bad idea for our country and planet. It contributes twice the amount of carbon emissions to our atmosphere that petroleum does, consuming an inordinate amount of water per unit of fuel, and requiring the expansion of ecologically and socially disastrous mining practices. Unlike Clinton and Obama, Edwards is the only leading candidate to oppose coal-to-liquid technology.

That's right: "Liquid coal is a bad idea for our country and planet."

We need a green president now, if we are to survive:

Q: Wouldn't it be nice to have a President that actually enforced the Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, and other environmental laws?

A: After 7 years of George Bush – the worst, most destructive environmental president in modern history – it is definitely time for change, and that change starts by electing John Edwards as President.

A final word from FoE Action President, Brent Blackwelder regarding what they and we can do to help elect a green president:

We plan to be especially active in New Hampshire, establishing an independent campaign and organization to carry the message about John Edwards' global warming plan and his vision for a healthy environment. There is a powerful, untapped environmental constituency out there that is up for grabs in this country and we are here to lend our voice to push that constituency toward Edwards. We believe he has the right vision and record to tap that constituency.

In New Hampshire, there are a lot of Democratic primary voters who care deeply about the quality of their environment and cite it as a top concern when choosing a nominee for president. In particular, voters in the Granite State are looking for real action to combat global warming. We plan to spend the next 3 months letting these voters know that John Edwards is the candidate best qualified and most committed to help achieve this big and bold goal.

Please visit the FoE Action website to find out how you can get involved in our campaign to elect John Edwards as president: FoE Action (www.foeaction.org)

Help FoE Action to elect our first green president: John Edwards.

Update: Radio Ad in NH by FoE. https://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/organizations/foe/images/humanity.mp3

What About Sexism and Racism in the Mainstream Blog Sphere?

Taylor Marsh has a good show, and occasionally, she is right about the impressions a campaign can make. She's from the entertainment business, so she has a sharp eye about what the populace's lenses may be.

I disagree with Taylor's commentaries when she shouts sexism and racism where it is not warranted. She is correct sometimes, but I think she stretches it a bit far at other times. She's had her share of discrimination, but one cannot call "wolf" each time someone of an opposite gender and race is critical of Clinton, of her, or her guests that favor Clinton in their comments.

I am very progressive but do not look for every ceiling to be necessarily glass either. One looks for ways to break the barriers. My observation is that Taylor thinks it is OK for Hillary to have Bill break the upper floor windows for all to see (Hillary already broke glass ceilings). And he has done it well, since he continues to have questionable "Dream Merchants" and "Carpetbaggers"in both negative and positive ways to solicit his advice and channel money into his wife's campaign coffers. Just read Harold Robbins, who had been gone 10 years this month, but a novelist who understood these transactions and why.

To me it is not OK.

As a woman, I've never had a man to promote me based on connections to my spouse, nor would I welcome those. Yes, basically, I can say in job interviews (which I've not needed for 6 years, but do an evaluation for peer reviews) I learned from mistakes and worked on my own to be a better manager and stepping into leadership, not just control the message which is all I see Hillary has learned. To her, that is all it is because of what happened to Bill and the 1998 scandal got out of hand.

I've not had name recognition based on my spouse either.

Either Clinton takes the aggressive route and claim credit for all what she did with Bill (which if NAFTA, horrible welfare reform, telecommunications act or not getting Bin Laden count) are accomplishments... or she runs strictly on her records outside First Lady roles in Ark and WH, and instead on her senate/her own activist (since 2001) records to run on.

So my vote for someone else not Hillary is laid out here. Name recognition is great, but status-quo is not.

An Interview with Brent Blackwelder

Note to BW Readers: this is a diary that was posted on MyDD this morning by Tom P. BW was given permission to redistribute the interview here. BW thanks Tom P for this interview concerning why FOE endorsed John Edwards.


Last week, Friends of the Earth Action ("FOE Action") endorsed John Edwards. This week, I interviewed Brent Blackwelder, President of Friends of the Earth and of Friends of the Earth Action, about FOE Action's endorsement of John Edwards.

Part I of the interview is in this diary.

Here's a little about FOE Action for those unfamiliar with it:

Founded by David Brower in 1967, Friends of the Earth Action has established a 35-year record of not only fighting the tough battles, but winning them too. FoE Action provides extra political muscle on legislative battles here in the U.S. for to our sister organization, Friends of the Earth, which is part of a network of affiliates in over 70 nations around the world.

snip

FoE Action looks beyond the symptoms of environmental degredation, to the systemic causes.

FOE Action

Mr. Blackwalder is a long-time advocate for the planet and the people on it. He has worked in Washington DC for over 30 years fighting for clean air, clean water, and a healthy planet. He has testified before Congress on environmental issues more than 100 times.

Mr. Blackwelder was founder and first chairman of the board of American Rivers, our nation's leading river-saving organization. He also founded the Environmental Policy Institute, which merged with Friends of the Earth in 1989. In 1994 he became president of Friends of the Earth and FOE Action.

More on Mr. Blackwelder here: Friends of the Earth

On October 14, FOE Action became the first major environmental organization to endorse a candidate for president, and they endorsed John Edwards:

WASHINGTON, DC -- Friends of the Earth Action (FOE Action), one of the longest-standing, national environmental organizations in the country, today announced its endorsement of Senator John Edwards for President, citing his leadership on real solutions to combat global warming and his unequivocal position against dangerous and expensive nuclear power.

"Friends of the Earth Action enthusiastically endorses John Edwards for President," said Brent Blackwelder, president of FOE Action.

Friends of the Earth Action Endorses John Edwards

Mr. Blackwelder answered 10 questions that I sent him via email. Here is Part I of the Interview. I will publish the remaining questions and answers in Part II tomorrow.

Q: What most differentiates John Edwards from the other Democratic presidential candidates with respect to environmental issues?

A: Of the leading Democratic candidates for president, John Edwards is most committed, and best prepared, to halt global warming and promote a healthy, livable planet for our families and our future. Friends of the Earth Action feels John Edwards has set the paces among all of the Democratic candidates by putting forth a plan that provides real action to combat global warming.

We encourage people to visit our web site, www.foeaction.org . to learn more about why we endorsed Edwards and facts about his environmental record.

Q: John Edwards has proposed a global warming plan that will reduce greenhouse pollution by 20 percent by 2020, and reduce it by 80 percent from 1990 levels by 2050. What in this plan do you feel will be most effective in achieving this reduction?

A: John Edwards plans to share America's clean energy technology with other nations in exchange for binding greenhouse reduction commitments. If necessary, he will insist that strong labor and environmental standards in our trade deals include commitments on climate change. This new deal will require global participation, promote shared responsibility, and let American workers and businesses compete on a level playing field. In addition, Edwards' plan will lead America to a new energy economy by investing in clean, renewable energy and creating a million new jobs.

Q: Polluters often attempt to present a false choice between environmental degradation and jobs. In fact, clean, green technologies can mean more jobs for Americans, and good paying jobs. Edwards proposes creating at least 1 million "green collar jobs" by investing in clean energy and energy efficient technologies. Can you explain the relationship of economic growth, including good paying jobs, and using clean, green technologies?

A: Edwards really gets it: green does not have to mean fewer jobs. If our nation makes serious and smart investments in clean energy technologies, such as wind, solar and geothermal, we can create good-paying jobs, expand markets for the renewable energy industry and secure our country's energy future.

Renewables are secure and viable alternatives to dirty, fossil fuels and costly and dangerous nuclear power. They can be scaled up relatively quickly, which means jobs and economic growth for states and local communities in the U.S., particularly in rural areas that have been hardest hit by economic downturns but have the space for these technologies to be constructed and brought online.

Q: What can FoE Action do to help John Edwards be nominated and then elected? I understand you plan to set up an independent campaign on Edwards' behalf in New Hampshire. How will that work? How can people inside and outside New Hampshire help you ?

A: We plan to be especially active in New Hampshire, establishing an independent campaign and organization to carry the message about John Edwards' global warming plan and his vision for a healthy environment. There is a powerful, untapped environmental constituency out there that is up for grabs in this country and we are here to lend our voice to push that constituency toward Edwards. We believe he has the right vision and record to tap that constituency.

In New Hampshire, there are a lot of Democratic primary voters who care deeply about the quality of their environment and cite it as a top concern when choosing a nominee for president. In particular, voters in the Granite State are looking for real action to combat global warming. We plan to spend the next 3 months letting these voters know that John Edwards is the candidate best qualified and most committed to help achieve this big and bold goal.

I'd like to thank Brent Blackwalder for granting me this interview and Jenna Moran for facilitating it. I will publish Part II of the interview tomorrow.

I also want to thank Mr. Blackwelder for his years of service to people and our planet in fighting corproate polluters and a corrupt government.

Please visit the FoE Action website to find out how you can get involved in our campaign to elect John Edwards as president: www.foeaction.org.

Video of Friends of the Earth endorsement in NH.
Video courtesy of Mbair.

Iowans for Sensible Priorities - A Message from John Edwards

Good video about Military waste spending. 21st century view, but modeled after Harry Truman.

Even Ron Paul Gets It Right about Leaving Iraq

Despite audience boos in the Fixed Noise moderated debate, Ron Paul got it right about the Iraq war and how Clinton is likely not to lead us out before the end of her first term.



I don't think Paul would have necessarily gone on the attack on Clinton had he been asked the question differently, but he spoke the truth, and I think to his advantage. Despite what Ken doll-Hannity thinks about who had the best night, text messages of best impression went to Ron Paul since he spoke the most forcefully on issues that matter to Republicans.

I find it more interesting that nearly all of the went on the attack on Clinton, and those in a focus group watching the debate, dialed it up more whenever Clinton's name was mentioned. If that isn't proof that Dems in the early states may have doubts on Clinton's general election electability, look at this True Blue Majority press release that mentions Edwards would carry more red states than other candidates.